| 標(biāo)題：醫(yī)療侵權(quán)的歸責(zé)原則探析 |
|
【摘要】國(guó)外有關(guān)醫(yī)療等服務(wù)業(yè)的立法，除對(duì)高度危險(xiǎn)作業(yè)如航空業(yè)采用無(wú)過(guò)失原則外，對(duì)其它服務(wù)業(yè)很少有采用。在 英、美等國(guó)判例中，分專門職業(yè)人員之服務(wù)性的醫(yī)療行為責(zé)任和商業(yè)上的交易性醫(yī)療行為責(zé)任，在這兩種醫(yī)療行為中又分單 純的醫(yī)療行為責(zé)任和混合醫(yī)療行為責(zé)任，而采取不同的態(tài)度。對(duì)醫(yī)師的責(zé)任應(yīng)以過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任為原則。對(duì)混合醫(yī)療 ……（快文網(wǎng)http://hoachina.com省略280字，正式會(huì)員可完整閱讀）…… 【abstract】in foreign countries．the principle of no fault compensation is rarely applied to service industry involving medical service except for highly dangerous job such as aerial working．in the usa and uk，medical behavior liability can be divided into two，one is for professional s service，the other is for commercial transaction，both of which are furtherly divided into pure medical behavior liability and mixed liab ility． doctor s liab ility should follow fault liability principle ， however， for damages due to medicine or medica ……（未完，全文共12068字，當(dāng)前只顯示726字，請(qǐng)閱讀下面提示信息。收藏醫(yī)療侵權(quán)的歸責(zé)原則探析） 上一篇：助產(chǎn)失誤娩下腦癱兒引發(fā)醫(yī)療糾紛1例分析 下一篇：特發(fā)性高尿鈣癥性血尿法醫(yī)學(xué)鑒定1例 相關(guān)欄目： |